Friday 26 October 2012

Guests In Female Foeticide Episode of SMJ


A feisty lecturer-turned-journalist, Meena Sharma has to her credit some award winning journalistic work. Her raw courage and determination went a long way in making the multi-state sting operations on doctors conducting sex selective tests and abortions a resounding success.



Highly respected in journalistic circles for being a professional with great credibility and integrity, Shripal Shaktwat has graced several senior positions in print and television journalism in Rajasthan. Time and again he has proven his mettle with breakthrough stories – including the sting operations on doctors conducting sex selective tests and abortions -- that have shaken the powers that be. Shaktawat is deeply rooted in the best cultural traditions of his home state and has often paid a heavy personal price for his forthright approach to journalism.



Amisha Yagnik, a resident of Ahmedabad works hard at bringing up her eight year old daughter whom she brought into this world after waging a tough battle against the son-syndrome pervading Indian society. Quiet and unassuming, Amisha is an unlikely hero. Yet, beneath her mellow exterior lie true grit and courage. Says Amisha, “If an injustice is occuring, don’t wait in the hope that things will improve. Don’t waste your years. Make a change before it is too late.”



Life threw Parveen Khan a challenge that could well have devastated the strongest amongst us. She was brutally defaced. In Parveen’s words, “My husband attacked me and bit my nose off completely. Losing your nose is no small matter. It’s like losing your honour. Wherever I went people stared at me and made nasty remarks.” But Parveen never gave up – on life, on her precious daughters and on herself. Her’s is a story that is the stuff of legends. 



Mitu Khurana is a doctor and qualified hospital administrator. Throughout their childhood, Mitu and her sister were never once made to feel as if being girls was a liability. Says Mitu, “I had such an amazing upbringing, so much love and freedom, I could never have imagined that my life after marriage would be so traumatic.” A doting mother, Mitu has fought hard to give birth to her lovely twin daughters. She also holds the distinction of being the first woman complainant under the PC&PNDT Act in Delhi.



A Jaipur based researcher and social worker, Ram Babu Bhatt’s is a well-known name in the field of social development and is deeply committed to the issues of women, children, tribals and dalits.



A gynalecologist by profession, Dr Shaili Agarwal has chosen to dedicate her skills for the benefit of the tribal communities in her native Pindwada, Rajasthan. She believes that we have a lot to learn from our tribal brethren.




Dr Puneet Bedi is a Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology at a leading New Delhi hospital. His main areas of interest are high risk pregnancies and fetal medicine. Dr Bedi has worked tirelessly in opposing the phneomenon of female foeticide at the risk of facing apporbation from fellow medicos.



A lawyer and social activist, Dr Rajendra Shukla is a well-known figure in the courtrooms of Ahmedabad. He is a man with a mission – reaching out to the downtrodden and underprivileged sections of society and lending them a helping hand. He has been instrumental in obtaining justice for Amisha Yagnik.



A protection officer in Rohtak, Haryana, Karminder Kaur works with the Crime Against Women Cell. Her experiences in the professional arena have brought Kaur face to face with the harshest social realities that threaten the security and well-being of women, within and outside their homes.



Researcher and social worker, Dr Virendra Vidrohi has been working on a wide spectrum of social issues ranging from the exploitation of women and children to livelihood and human rights issues in the district of Alwar, Rajasthan. Dr Vidrohi’s social concerns run deep and are informed by his vast understanding of the social realities of his region.

Read more ...

Social Problem Female Foeticide


Social Problem Female Foeticide


A mother’s grief

After marriage, the prospect of having a child is a nightmare for women who are pressurized to produce a boy under pain of rejection and torture. The concept of a loving mother who nurtures and forms the foundation of lives is deeply ingrained in the Indian psyche. In reality, the way mothers are treated is sometimes shocking.

Amisha Yagnik from Ahmedabad has an eight-year-old daughter, Kamya. Before eventually managing to save her daughter’s life, Amisha had to undergo the nightmare of abortion after abortion when her husband and in-laws forcibly had her tested – and did away with the foetus when it was found to be female. The first time it happened, Amisha was given an anaesthetic, and realized that her pregnancy had been terminated only when she awoke.When Amisha was expecting Kamya, she was at her maternal home; she stayed there until she gave birth. That allowed her daughter to escape being killed while in the womb.

It is important to note that the woman is usually blamed for the sex of the child; this is incorrect, because it is the man who is responsible for the baby’s gender, not the woman.

Parveen Khan of Morena, Madhya Pradesh, gave birth to her first child, a girl, and then had to undergo two abortions in the span of a year – and also a miscarriage. Her husband was so adamant in his desire for a boy that in his anger, he assaulted Parveen one afternoon and actually chewed up her face, resulting in grievous injuries and disfigurement.

A problem for all sections of society

Anywhere between three and five crore girls have been killed before even seeing the light of life. Contrary to popular belief, this happens among urban, educated sections as much as, if not more than, in rural areas.
Census figures show that in the year 2011, for every 1000 boys there were only 914 girls. Video testimony from people all over India show that people think female foeticide is predominantly a rural phenomenon, but in reality it is practised more widely in urban India. 

The story of Dr Mitu Khurana, is an example of the approach towards daughters in middle class, educated India. Mitu alleges that when she refused to undergo a sonography, she was tricked into one in the guise of a kidney test. and was then pressurised to abort the twin girls she was carrying.The testimony of Rambabu Bhatt shows that as per his research, people from all walks of life – from IAS officers to health department officials – condone female foeticide. Doctors and clinics offer package deals of sonography combined with abortion. At the other end of the spectrum, as Dr Shaili Agarwal explains, are Adivasi people who, she has found, don’t want to know the gender of the gestating child. They are happy with their children, of whichever gender. 

Bharati, a vegetable vendor who lives in Ahmedabad is a young mother who has a daughter. She wanted a girl, while her husband wanted a boy, but she says that he is now happy with their daughter. She says she is aware of sex determination tests and foeticide, but says that she would “never commit such a sin”. 

The social conspiracy

Why is there no widespread outrage against female foeticide? Society, the law and the official machinery turn a blind eye and those who try to find a solution are harassed and persecuted. 

Dr Puneet Bedi, a well-known gynaecologist, explains how female foeticide began to happen in the 1970s when the rise in population was seen as the root cause of the nation’s problems, and various efforts were on to curb the population explosion. The issue began in a government institution, with a paper published by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, which postulated that people, in the desire for a male child, were producing daughters until they got a son, almost as if the girls were a by-product in the manufacture of the boy child.

The proposal was that if girls could be eliminated before birth, people would have less children and this would be one solution to the population problem. Hence sex determination tests were offered in major hospitals, with government encouragement. When some activists raised an objection, the government stopped the facility being offered in public hospitals. But by then the damage had been done.

People had come to know that pre-natal sex determination could be done, and the technicians and doctors who had been trained for this started offering it in the private sector to meet the demand. Initially amniocentesis was carried out to determine the gender of the foetus, but this was expensive and involved a high level of risk. When ultrasound technology came in, about 1990, it was a gold mine for doctors as testing became easier and faster. It ended up being a Rs 2,000-3,000 crore industry.

What is the solution for this? Dr Bedi suggests that some prominent doctors should immediately be made examples of, and punished so as to act as a deterrent. This has been done in Korea where in the ’90s, some selected prominent doctors were imprisoned and had their licences cancelled for female foeticide.

This resulted in the practice being stopped, and eventually in correction of the sex ratio. In India there are an estimated 50,000 doctors involved in this practice, and it may be noted that there are a total of some 70,000 to 80,000 gynaecologists in all of India. But the Indian Medical Council has not cancelled the licence of even one doctor for female foeticide so far. In a way this is condoning the killing, and sending the message that female foeticide is not considered a crime.


Dr Rajendra Shukla, the advocate who represented Amisha Yagnik, says that during the bail hearing for Amisha’s husband and in-laws, the judge remarked in the open court that there was nothing wrong in desiring a male child, that everyone wants their bloodline to be continued. Shuklaji also said the judge pulled up the police officer who conducted the case, for being hasty in making the arrests.

Clearly, the crime is not taken seriously at all. Two journalists from Rajasthan tried to bring the issue into the open and expose the nexus behind it. Meena Sharma and Shripal Shaktawat carried out a sting operation on 140 doctors in 36 cities, revealing that female foeticide is available at the drop of a hat and on payment of package amounts, in an extremely organised way. But the result is that the exposed doctors are still practising, some have been promoted, and the journalists themselves have been facing continuous and severe harassment as well as the difficulty of travelling from place to place for the cases in different courts. 

Aamir Khan says that he is initiating a campaign to send a letter to the Chief Minister of Rajasthan asking for a fast-track court to collate and handle all the cases against Meena Sharma and Shripal Shaktawat. He invites people to join him in the campaign.

A world without women – the grim reality

A dearth of women due to female foeticide will result in them being traded like commodities. The horrible truth is that this is already happening.

When such pains are taken to produce only male children, what happens to those children when they grow up? A conversation with a group of young men from Haryana reveals the truth. They are all over 30, all unmarried, and are unable to find life partners because there simply are no girls. 

The situation is so dire that in the next 10 years, there will be 2 crore men who will be unable to find spouses. The end result is a marriage bazaar where women will be bartered and traded, and crimes against women will only grow and become more heinous. Does this sound like fiction?

Social worker Virendra Vidrohi from Alwar, Rajasthan, tells the story of his region’s “brides” – some 15,000 women who have been brought from places such as Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhatisgarh, Odisha, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh because the men of Alwar district cannot find women in their own area. These women, who are from poor families, have been purchased, and Virendra ji says that 15,000 is not even an alarmingly large number as there are 1,900 villages and towns where this practice is carried out.

Anandbala Todarmal from Bhilwara adds that in her community of Jains too, the shortage of women due to female foeticide has resulted in brides being procured from other states. 

Karminder Kaur, who is a state protection officer from Haryana, highlights that the buying of women has led to a further degradation in their status and condition. Far from being treated like brides, they become commodities and are used by all the men in the household. Moreover, they cannot protest as they are told they will be thrown out and other women will be bought in their place. The other problem is that women from Haryana itself are extremely unsafe. Any woman who goes out of doors – be it for studies or to the workplace – faces the possibility of assault, kidnapping and rape from the men of Haryana. In such a grim scenario, it comes as a ray of hope that there are actually people who have managed to change the situation.

What can be done?

The law is in place but implementation is lacking. The solution lies in changing the system, changing official and social attitudes, and in taking individual action. Nawanshahr in Punjab is an example of how female foeticide can be stopped, and the sex ratio can be corrected by the sheer will of the people. In 2005, there were just 785 girls for every 1000 boys, and the new district deputy commissioner, Krishna Kumar, organised a seminar for doctors, midwives and educationists, to warn against female foeticide. Action was taken against transgressors, and a phone helpline was set up for expectant mothers. Through rallies, public meetings and street plays, awareness was generated and the sex ratio changed by 71 points from 2001 to 2011.

If Navanshehar can do it, the whole country can do it. The deaths of 10 lakh girls in the womb every year is not merely a statistic, it shows us a shameful facet of our thinking, and raises a very fundamental question about our sense of identity. 

It is possible for each one of us to do something, right now, to ensure that India does not become the mother of only boys, that India’s daughters are not denied the right to live.



Read more ...

Female Foeticide Fact


Female Foeticide Fact


Humankind could not possibly be so stupid, But humankind has been both, stupid and cruel. Over the years, all over India, the thirst for only male children has led countless expectant parents to kill their female foetuses in cold blood. Historically, the killing of newborn girls has been documented as far back as the 18th century, but it has become even more widespread, and insidious, with the killing of foetuses after determining their gender, in the supposedly enlightened 20th and 21st centuries. 

Taken in isolation or in parts the numbers may not be overwhelming. But cumulatively, over the last 50 years, India has killed over 30 million of its girl babies, even before birth. 

The immediate result of this – a drop in the child sex ratio which has gone from alarming to frightening. In the 0-6 age group, from a ratio of 1010 girls to every 1000 boys in 1941, the year 2011 saw a ratio of 914 girls to every 1000 boys.

The grim consequences
Stop to consider that each person wants a life partner. But when there are not enough women to match the number of men – what then? What happens to the 86 boys per thousand who are left without a corresponding female partner? The consequences, once the subject of creative visualisation by writers and filmmakers, are today a grim reality. By 2020 there will be 23 million men in the age group of 20-49, who will not find partners due to the deficit of women caused by female foeticide.

In an imagined, fanciful dimension, the woman would be treasured, revered and exalted. But in actuality, it is the opposite. The woman is completely devalued, and has every one of her rights taken away from her. She is treated as a commodity by her own family, her price is fixed by the male brokers who decide her fate. The practice of marriage is made into a farce.

A fate worse than death
The woman, far from being lucky to have survived and escaped foeticide or infanticide, ends up even more worse off: She is sold; shunted to another part of the country where the language and customs are strange to her, where she is often treated as an outcast and an alien; and, most horrible of all, she is “shared” between several men in the same household. 

How did this horrific scenario come to happen? Historically, India has always looked upon children as wealth. The more children, the better, as they can help with the family work – agriculture or business – when they grow up. But historically India has also lurched under the burden of the dowry system, which itself has led to the gruesome deaths of innumerable young married women in their marital homes. Faced with the prospect of saving up and then spending lakhs for a daughter’s wedding, new parents seek a “solution” at birth itself – kill the baby if it is a girl. Among land-owning communities, another reason for killing the girl baby is the desire to keep the land within the family’s own sons, and not let a son-in-law lay claim to it. Sometimes, women themelves opt to abort rather than see their daughters suffer in a male-skewed world.

In the days when female infanticide was prevalent, there were different methods of killing newborn girls in different parts of the country. So institutionalised was the practice that it literally had its own traditions. Certain songs were sung when the baby was being smothered, or buried alive, or drowned. Often, the song tells her to go and send back a boy in her place. In Punjab, she is told to go, take gur (jaggery) and send it back with a brother. In that community, when a boy is born gur is distributed in the village.

Sitting targets in the womb
In the 1970s, technology enabled the killing to be done one step before birth. It became possible to determine the gender of the unborn baby at a stage when abortion was possible, and legal. Originally conceived as a government solution for terminating foetuses with severe medical problems, pre-natal testing also revealed the gender of the foetus. Parents, eager to avoid having a girl child, decided to terminate female foetuses. Doctors, seeing a lucrative business ahead, offered sex determination tests and abortions to willing parents. For a country struggling with a population explosion, this seemed like an easy answer to keeping the numbers down. The thinking was that in the desire for a male child, parents continue to have girl children till such time as a boy was not born. Terminating the pregnancy of a girl foetus would eliminate this aspect, it was felt. 

Activists and authorities soon realised that what was happening was a systematic elimination of girls, and warnings began to be sounded about its dire consequences. After a partial ban in 1976, government hospitals and clinics no longer offered pre-natal testing, but the monster had been unleashed. The private sector had, literally, scented blood. The lure of money overrode any inhibitions some unscrupulous doctors may have had.Sex determination became even easier with the introduction of ultrasound technology in [the early 1990s]. This did away with the painful practice of amniocentesis and other dangerous methods. Sonography became a corner-shop service, offered in mobile vans and often as a “package” along with the subsequent abortion.

In the 1980s the drive against female foeticide and sex determination techniques gained strength. In 1982 the Centre for Women’s Development Studies (CWDS) launched the first campaign, in response to a pre-natal diagnostic clinic which was openly advertising its services, terming daughters as liabilities to the family and a threat to the nation, and encouraging expectant parents to rid themselves of the “danger”. More campaigns came up in different parts of the country, the move for an all-India ban on sex determination tests gained momentum, and the Pre Natal Diagnostic Tests (Regulation and Prohibition of Misuse) Act, 1994 (called the PNDT Act) came into force in January 1996.

Has the law helped?
Implementing the Act on the ground was another matter, however, and sex determination and female foeticide continued, practically unchecked. Following more protests and a public interest litigation by activists’ groups, the Supreme Court issued a directive in 2001 calling upon all state governments to strictly implement the law.
Nevertheless, sex determination continued clandestinely – as is reflected in a further anti-girl child skew in the child sex ratio from that year. In 2003, the PNDT Act was amended and renamed as the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.Has it helped? Having read so far, cynical readers would imagine that it has not. And they would be right. Families routinely take pregnant women for “check-ups” which are actually sonographies; women are regularly either coerced and forced into abortion, or are given an anasethetic and upon waking find that their pregnancy has been terminated. All this naturally takes an awful toll on their physical and mental health.

Women who try to escape this nightmare don’t have it easy. The law may be on their side in letter, but the enforcers of the law are more often than not on the side of the perpetrators.
The combination of greed, social attitudes and practices, family pressure, lack of political will and lacunae in the law enforcement setup leads to heavy under-reporting of the crime, and a low conviction rate. In some cases, even when doctors are convicted, they are not imprisoned but released after paying a fine. When millions are killed in a relatively short span of time, it is termed genocide. India’s 30 million missing girls are not evoking the same kind of outrage, however, although female foeticide actually meets four out of five criteria to be termed genocide. In the case of female foeticide, the killing has happened before the girls came into this world. The killing has happened over several decades. But the fact remains that the killing has happened, and continues to happen. For this to change, attitudes towards women and girls must undergo a very fundamental transformation on a large scale.

Read more ...

What Aamir says on Female Foeticide


What Aamir says on Female Foeticide


What is it about boys… or men… or males… that fascinates us so much because of which we are, as a society, collectively moving towards eradicating the girl child in the womb?!!!

Are boys really that special? Or dramatically different?

Every conceivable reason that I have come across during our research of people explaining why they want a boy and not a girl as a daughter does not seem to make any sense to me. For instance, “if we have a girl then at the time of her marriage we have to pay dowry”, or “a girl cannot perform the last rites after the death of her parents, or near and dear ones”, or “the girl can’t take the *vansh*, or family forward”… etc. All these are man made reasons. We have created dowry and are now killing the girl child as if she is responsible for it. We have decided for ourselves that girls can’t perform last rites and then we say the girl is to blame. In fact, the *vansh aage kaise chalega *argument is one that is most absurd… because females are the ones who take the human race forward!!! Men can’t have babies; the one who takes the family forward IS THE WOMAN! So, what on earth are we thinking? Where are these warped thoughts coming from?

We need to sit back and consider, not only this illness in our head, but also the fact that girls… are so special. A girl brings fragrance and joy into our lives. She has the kind of sensitivity that a boy may not be ableto bring. The home lights up with a baby girl… girls are so caring. The delicacy, grace, beauty, and radiance that my daughter, Ira, brings into our lives, my son Junaid can never bring. He has other qualities which are unique and which make him special, and we love him as much. But what a girl brings to our lives a boy can’t and vice versa. Because, both are unique.Women are far more caring than men are, far more resilient. And the differences between males and females ought to be celebrated, cherished andappreciated.

Customs are man made. We can change them… and we ought to.

When I think of the number of women all across our country who are made to feel inadequate and insignificant. Who are made to feel bad that they are lesser for some reason… for carrying a baby girl in their womb. As if they were given a job to do and didn’t do it right. As if they were incompetent. When I think of all of them, it really saddens my heart.

The birth of a child, or a mother carrying a baby in her womb for nine months, is a miracle of nature. And at such a time the woman has to be made to feel special… like a queen. She is closest to God at that time… closest to nature at that time… in a place where no man can ever be! If we have any sense… then at that time we will value her as the most special being of nature, capable of giving life, which no man can do. Instead of making her feel special, like she is, we make her feel small and judged. And ironically, for something over which she has no control! In fact, as we know, it is the sperm of the male that decides the sex of the child.

And what is this great hurry to discover the sex of your child?

Science and medicine should be used sparingly, to the bare minumum, and only for making our life more healthy when an emergency arises. The misuse of science to discover the sex of your child is not only criminal as per Indian law, it is foolish in the impact it has on society, and also, above all, you rob yourself of the magical moment when the new life comes into this world and you discover for yourself the gift that nature has given you. In the case of all my three children the moment when the doctor told us "congratulations, you have a healthy boy / girl" was such a special moment for us, one that I will never forget.

Female foeticide has to stop.

I propose that we as a society should show only the highest regard, respect, love and appreciation for those proud parents of girls. We should do away with archaic customs which disempower our strong little girls. Every time a baby girl is born in your family, in your neighbourhood, in your friends’ circle, your love appreciation and warmth should be stronger to correct and heal this temporary illness that we are suffering from, and from which I am sure we will emerge.

And let’s have a definite target. The census of 2021.


Read more ...

Preview of Female Foeticide Episode


Preview of Female Foeticide Episode


Daughters Are Precious

The killing of unborn girls, or female foeticide, is an alarming reality. Party to the crime are families, some unscrupulous doctors and a social structure that encourages the desire for a boy child – at any cost. The frightening result has been the snuffing out of the lives of more than three crore unborn girls since Independence.

This episode introduces us to women who have lived through the pain of this social reality, having fought to save their daughters. It examines how large-scale female foeticide is impacting young men in some regions of the country as they are finding it difficult to get marriage partners. It sheds light on the collusion of medical practitioners with those who wish to perpetuate the abhorrent practice, resulting in a system that allows sex determination and female foeticide to flourish even though the law expressly forbids both. It tells us what happens when two journalists expose this practice on a mass scale, chronicles some inspiring stories of change and points out what the average person can do to change it.

A mother’s grief

After marriage, the prospect of having a child is a nightmare for women who are pressurized to produce a boy under pain of rejection and torture. The concept of a loving mother who nurtures and forms the foundation of lives is deeply ingrained in the Indian psyche. In reality, the way mothers are treated is sometimes shocking.

Amisha Yagnik from Ahmedabad has an eight-year-old daughter, Kamya. Before eventually managing to save her daughter’s life, Amisha had to undergo the nightmare of abortion after abortion when her husband and in-laws forcibly had her tested – and did away with the foetus when it was found to be female. The first time it happened, Amisha was given an anaesthetic, and realized that her pregnancy had been terminated only when she awoke.When Amisha was expecting Kamya, she was at her maternal home; she stayed there until she gave birth. That allowed her daughter to escape being killed while in the womb.

It is important to note that the woman is usually blamed for the sex of the child; this is incorrect, because it is the man who is responsible for the baby’s gender, not the woman.

Parveen Khan of Morena, Madhya Pradesh, gave birth to her first child, a girl, and then had to undergo two abortions in the span of a year – and also a miscarriage. Her husband was so adamant in his desire for a boy that in his anger, he assaulted Parveen one afternoon and actually chewed up her face, resulting in grievous injuries and disfigurement.

A problem for all sections of society
Anywhere between three and five crore girls have been killed before even seeing the light of life. Contrary to popular belief, this happens among urban, educated sections as much as, if not more than, in rural areas.
Census figures show that in the year 2011, for every 1000 boys there were only 914 girls. Video testimony from people all over India show that people think female foeticide is predominantly a rural phenomenon, but in reality it is practised more widely in urban India. 

The story of Dr Mitu Khurana, is an example of the approach towards daughters in middle class, educated India. Mitu alleges that when she refused to undergo a sonography, she was tricked into one in the guise of a kidney test. and was then pressurised to abort the twin girls she was carrying.The testimony of Rambabu Bhatt shows that as per his research, people from all walks of life – from IAS officers to health department officials – condone female foeticide. Doctors and clinics offer package deals of sonography combined with abortion. At the other end of the spectrum, as Dr Shaili Agarwal explains, are Adivasi people who, she has found, don’t want to know the gender of the gestating child. They are happy with their children, of whichever gender. 

Bharati, a vegetable vendor who lives in Ahmedabad is a young mother who has a daughter. She wanted a girl, while her husband wanted a boy, but she says that he is now happy with their daughter. She says she is aware of sex determination tests and foeticide, but says that she would “never commit such a sin”. 

The social conspiracy
Why is there no widespread outrage against female foeticide? Society, the law and the official machinery turn a blind eye and those who try to find a solution are harassed and persecuted. 

Dr Puneet Bedi, a well-known gynaecologist, explains how female foeticide began to happen in the 1970s when the rise in population was seen as the root cause of the nation’s problems, and various efforts were on to curb the population explosion. The issue began in a government institution, with a paper published by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, which postulated that people, in the desire for a male child, were producing daughters until they got a son, almost as if the girls were a by-product in the manufacture of the boy child. The proposal was that if girls could be eliminated before birth, people would have less children and this would be one solution to the population problem. Hence sex determination tests were offered in major hospitals, with government encouragement. When some activists raised an objection, the government stopped the facility being offered in public hospitals. But by then the damage had been done. People had come to know that pre-natal sex determination could be done, and the technicians and doctors who had been trained for this started offering it in the private sector to meet the demand. Initially amniocentesis was carried out to determine the gender of the foetus, but this was expensive and involved a high level of risk. When ultrasound technology came in, about 1990, it was a gold mine for doctors as testing became easier and faster. It ended up being a Rs 2,000-3,000 crore industry.

What is the solution for this? Dr Bedi suggests that some prominent doctors should immediately be made examples of, and punished so as to act as a deterrent. This has been done in Korea where in the ’90s, some selected prominent doctors were imprisoned and had their licences cancelled for female foeticide. This resulted in the practice being stopped, and eventually in correction of the sex ratio. In India there are an estimated 50,000 doctors involved in this practice, and it may be noted that there are a total of some 70,000 to 80,000 gynaecologists in all of India. But the Indian Medical Council has not cancelled the licence of even one doctor for female foeticide so far. In a way this is condoning the killing, and sending the message that female foeticide is not considered a crime.

Dr Rajendra Shukla, the advocate who represented Amisha Yagnik, says that during the bail hearing for Amisha’s husband and in-laws, the judge remarked in the open court that there was nothing wrong in desiring a male child, that everyone wants their bloodline to be continued. Shuklaji also said the judge pulled up the police officer who conducted the case, for being hasty in making the arrests.

Clearly, the crime is not taken seriously at all. Two journalists from Rajasthan tried to bring the issue into the open and expose the nexus behind it. Meena Sharma and Shripal Shaktawat carried out a sting operation on 140 doctors in 36 cities, revealing that female foeticide is available at the drop of a hat and on payment of package amounts, in an extremely organised way. But the result is that the exposed doctors are still practising, some have been promoted, and the journalists themselves have been facing continuous and severe harassment as well as the difficulty of travelling from place to place for the cases in different courts. 

Aamir Khan says that he is initiating a campaign to send a letter to the Chief Minister of Rajasthan asking for a fast-track court to collate and handle all the cases against Meena Sharma and Shripal Shaktawat. He invites people to join him in the campaign.

A world without women – the grim reality

A dearth of women due to female foeticide will result in them being traded like commodities. The horrible truth is that this is already happening.
When such pains are taken to produce only male children, what happens to those children when they grow up? A conversation with a group of young men from Haryana reveals the truth. They are all over 30, all unmarried, and are unable to find life partners because there simply are no girls. 

The situation is so dire that in the next 10 years, there will be 2 crore men who will be unable to find spouses. The end result is a marriage bazaar where women will be bartered and traded, and crimes against women will only grow and become more heinous. Does this sound like fiction?

Social worker Virendra Vidrohi from Alwar, Rajasthan, tells the story of his region’s “brides” – some 15,000 women who have been brought from places such as Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhatisgarh, Odisha, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh because the men of Alwar district cannot find women in their own area. These women, who are from poor families, have been purchased, and Virendra ji says that 15,000 is not even an alarmingly large number as there are 1,900 villages and towns where this practice is carried out.

Anandbala Todarmal from Bhilwara adds that in her community of Jains too, the shortage of women due to female foeticide has resulted in brides being procured from other states. 

Karminder Kaur, who is a state protection officer from Haryana, highlights that the buying of women has led to a further degradation in their status and condition. Far from being treated like brides, they become commodities and are used by all the men in the household. Moreover, they cannot protest as they are told they will be thrown out and other women will be bought in their place. The other problem is that women from Haryana itself are extremely unsafe. Any woman who goes out of doors – be it for studies or to the workplace – faces the possibility of assault, kidnapping and rape from the men of Haryana. In such a grim scenario, it comes as a ray of hope that there are actually people who have managed to change the situation.
What can be done?

The law is in place but implementation is lacking. The solution lies in changing the system, changing official and social attitudes, and in taking individual action. Nawanshahr in Punjab is an example of how female foeticide can be stopped, and the sex ratio can be corrected by the sheer will of the people. In 2005, there were just 785 girls for every 1000 boys, and the new district deputy commissioner, Krishna Kumar, organised a seminar for doctors, midwives and educationists, to warn against female foeticide. Action was taken against transgressors, and a phone helpline was set up for expectant mothers. Through rallies, public meetings and street plays, awareness was generated and the sex ratio changed by 71 points from 2001 to 2011.

If Navanshehar can do it, the whole country can do it. The deaths of 10 lakh girls in the womb every year is not merely a statistic, it shows us a shameful facet of our thinking, and raises a very fundamental question about our sense of identity. 

It is possible for each one of us to do something, right now, to ensure that India does not become the mother of only boys, that India’s daughters are not denied the right to live. Satyamev Jayate will ask you a question every week, which you can answer by SMS. Each SMS costs Re 1, which is donated after tax to the charity Snehalaya

Foeticide Episode sms question


Today’s question is: Do you want the Rajasthan government to set up a fast-track court to process the cases arising from Meena Sharma and Shripal Shaktawat’s sting operation on doctors carrying out female foeticide? SMS Y or N, for Yes or No respectively, to 5782711.Change is possible, change is in our hands.


Read more ...

Thursday 27 September 2012

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

some photos from the aamir khan's popular tv show satyamev jayate

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan

Satyamev Jayate Aamir Khan


Read more ...

Wednesday 5 September 2012